About Me

Name: Casey
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

What legal authority?


 

 

Sorry about being away ffr so long.


I have gotten tired of our government doing things and passing laws they have no power to do or pass and telling the American people to go jump.

I have been researching several things learning what I as a citizen can do to stop them.  Among them are -

Citizens rights to file injunctions to stop action by the Congress and the President.

Since everyone knows that pork projects are to buy votes and pay back contributors, do they constitute vote buying and or bribery?

Law prohibits suing for recovery of or monetary damages but can a citizen sue to remove any member of Congress, not just the one who represents us, that fails to uphold our laws?

Example the failure to uphold immigration laws, etc.

If you can answer any of these questions or have any suggestions please let me know.  If you have been doing research on these things please share so we do not duplicate the work

Thanks
Ken

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Fairness Doctrine

 

In 90’s President Bill Clinton opened the attach on talk radio by calling a talk station while traveling in Airforce one and complaining that Rush Limbaugh and talk radio had an unfair advantage over him, THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES. Because Rush had three hours a day to get the conservative message out and that he, THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED did not have that opportunity.

In 2002 a R.I.N.O. from AZ named Mc Cain joined with a true Democrat from WI to draft and act that shuts the voice of the people expressing opinions about politics and policy. Members of Congress (The imperial Body.) voted for the act.

Now Hillary Clinton has teamed with George Soros, F.A.I.R., and the Center for American Progress whose President and Chief Executive Officer is John Podesta. John Posesta was Chief of Staff to President William J. Clinton from October 1998 until January 2001 to shut down conservative talk radio.

The Center for American Progress and its sister organization Free Press recently released a report titled The Right Wing Domination Of Talk Radio And How To End It. http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2007/06/pdf/talk_radio.pdf .

 

Democrats and some Republican ("RINO’s) are attempting to bring the Fairness Doctrine back citing a 1969 Supreme Court ruling.

Do not confuse the "Equal-time rule" with the fairness doctrine. This rule gives a politician the right to demand airtime on radio or Television for his opposing view.

The Fairness Doctrine is an attempt to extend the equal-time rule to anyone with an opposing opinion to force radio only to give them free airtime. Notice that in any discussion of the Fairness Doctrine television is never mentioned.

Although similar laws had been deemed unconstitutional when applied to newspapers, the Court ruled that radio stations could be regulated in this way because of the limited nature of the public airwave spectrum. Once again note the absence of any reference to television.

Supreme Court Decision

  • "A license permits broadcasting, but the licensee has no constitutional right to be the one who holds the license or to monopolize a... frequency to the exclusion of his fellow citizens. There is nothing in the First Amendment, which prevents the Government from requiring a licensee to share his frequency with others.... It is the right of the viewers and listeners, not the right of the broadcasters, which is paramount."
U.S. Supreme Court, upholding the constitutionality of the Fairness Doctrine in Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. FCC, 1969.
 
A little history. (Source - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fairness_Doctrine)

In 1986, the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld a loose interpretation by the FCC of an aspect of the Fairness Doctrine, ruling that Congress had "never made the doctrine a binding requirement." In August 1987, the Commission abolished the doctrine by a 4-0 vote, in its Syracuse Peace Council decision. The FCC insisted the doctrine had grown to inhibit rather than enhance debate and suggested that, due to the many media voices in the marketplace at the time, the doctrine was perceived to be unconstitutional.

In the spring of 1987, Congress attempted to contest the FCC vote and restore the Doctrine (S. 742, 100th Cong., 1st Sess. (1987)), but President Ronald Reagan vetoed the legislation. Another attempt to resurrect the doctrine in 1991 ran out of steam when President George H.W. Bush threatened another veto.

The emergence of another attempt to reinstate the F. D. is being funded and pushed by F.A.I.R., "Fairness and Accuracy in the Media" (http://www.fair.org/index.php) a group founded by Democrat supporter George Soros. Soros has admitted that he worked with the Nazis rounding up Jews to be exterminated although he claims that he did not know he was doing so at the time. It is rumored that he escaped prosecution as a war criminal because of his Jewish heritage and his age.

F.A.I.R. has a web site that advises members on how to find and report "unfairness" on the radio. It also list a large number of leftist and Demarcate activist organizations you can report your findings to along with news and FCC contacts. (See links listed below.) In addition, in their articles they always attempt to link Conservatives to any extremist organization they are writing about.

Since F.A.I.R. has made such an effort get people involved I suggest that of us that truly believe in "FAIRNESS AND ACCUACY IN THE MEDIA" use the info provided by them to foil their plans.

Rather than a haphazard approach, attack if you prefer, I suggest you use the following plan.

Remember that the lefts and democrats favorite tool can be used against them. Threaten or actually file a class action lawsuit. It cost less than one hundred dollars in most jurisdictions and you do not need an attorney.

Government representatives. Local, state and federal. Notify them that talk radio is the only means available to you to get your opinion heard because most representatives do not respond, television presents a biased twisted view supporting the left and have not established a way for you to air your point of view. Contact all rep.’s in your state even if you do not live in their districts. Their names, addresses and phone numbers can be found in the front of your local phone book. Let them know that you will initiate a Class Action lawsuit if television and newspapers are not included in any F.D. law. Always document incidents of bias against your views or incomplete or corrupt reporting and comments.

The FCC. Notify them that since television and the newspapers have as many editorials as news features that you want them included in any fairness doctrine laws. Keep track of the number of times you have tried to express an opinion and let the FCC know also let a local talk radio station know. Emphasize that the only way you have of getting your opinion listened to is on talk radio. Let them know that you will initiate a Class Action lawsuit if television and newspapers are not included in any F.D. law. Always document incidents of bias against your views or incomplete or corrupt reporting and comments.

 

Newspapers. If your newspaper has a blog site post this on their blog, write letter after letter to "letters to the editor’ stating you demand equal time to a column or ad. Keep sending them until you are published. Let them know that you will initiate a Class Action lawsuit if television and newspapers are not included in any F.D. law. Always document incidents of bias against your views or incomplete or corrupt reporting and comments.

Television. Television stations both local and national often try to present opinion as news. If your Television stations have a blog site post this on their blog, write letter after letter to the station stating you demand equal time to a column or ad. Keep sending them until you get a response. Let them know that you will initiate a Class Action lawsuit if television and newspapers are not included in any F.D. law. Always document incidents of bias against your views or incomplete or corrupt reporting and comments.

Cable Television.

 

 

One way is to visit their site and download all their information and use the contacts they provide demand that any F.D. Includes both television and the print media. Do not just write a letter or send an email giving your opinion; demand equal time or space to give your opposing view. Copy the letter or email to local radio stations and the FCC. Let all news organizations especially television and newspapers know that you demand the F.D. pertain to them as well as radio. Pretty soon they will start to oppose the F.D.

Another is to flood the FCC with demands that all news including National Public radio and television be included.

Activism Page: http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=6

FAIR's Media Contact List:

FAIR's Media Activism Kit:

Media Activism Groups:

Online News Sources:

Challenging Hate Radio: A Guide For Activists.

 

It seems that an informed public and Conservatives in particular are an obstacle to our Imperial Congress taking total control of America and its citizens. We have already experienced the passing of power from Father to son in the case of the Kennedy’s and the Gore’s as well as others.

Term limits seem to be the only way to end these dynasties. When term limits were passed by some states remember who challenged them in court rather than accept the fact that the people had spoken through their votes?

Our President faces term limits so why not the Congress???

Standup and fight for what you believe in.

"K"

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Global Warming? Follow the money trail.

 

Global Warming? Follow the money trail.

Part one.

I have spent the better part of my adult life, catching criminals, exposing scams and swindles. I have been active in politics since my return from Vietnam in 1969. One thing I have learned is that a politician, regardless of party, will not propose, endorse or vote for any bill or law that does not bring him votes, power and/or wealth.

When they first started talking about "Global Warming" I knew it to be true and I knew from reading past studies that the sun probably causes it. When certain people (non-scientist) claim that it is being caused by man kind alarms started going off in my head. I watched the documentary "An Inconvenient Truth" and thought no one would believe its message because the lies were so obvious.

When Mr. Gore appeared before a congressional committee and stated that "The debate is over!" and then called anyone who disagreed a "denier" I started looking for the "Money Trail." It didn’t take long to discover that Mr. Gore and a group of wealthy investors had formed a company to sell "Carbon Credits" and invest the money in companies working on technology to improve the environment.

Sound good doesn’t it? It seems this company only sold "Carbon Credits" to its investors and stock holders. Basically, it is a scam allowing them to invest and earn dividends while avoiding taxes and maintain their high-energy usage by buying these so-called Carbon Credits.

I have since learned that some EU countries are imposing a tax on certain Carbon, (CO2 ) producing items completely ignoring the fact that CO 2 is not a pollutant. Also that the state of California is trying to pass a bill that allows them to tax individuals on carbon producing or energy usage in the home. These are to be called "Carbon Credits". The Democrats in our Federal Government are writing a similar bill. Can you say another tax?

Additional taxes seem to be the force behind "An Inconvenient Truth." In order to make this tax appear legitimate it was necessary to label carbon (CO2) a pollutant and harmful to the environment. This is being done by the documentary "An Inconvenient Truth."


I have compiled a mountain of evidence that the debate is not over and proof that Mr. Gore is lying. This is the first in a multi part series.

Doomsday called off. (Video)

In the 80’s the United Nations used surface temperature and computer models to prove global warming was affecting the world. Since temperatures vary widely in different locations around the world and at different levels of the atmosphere A group of renowned Scientist and climatologist realized that in research the warning about using computers is "Garbage in, garbage out". They set decided to use modern technology (satellite data, etc.) to support global warming. They were surprised to learn that their research disproved the global warming theory.

  1. Scientist prove that the debate is over according to the left, is not over and expose background of the "Consensus of scientist."

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JNCgoiGYjM

    Global Warming Myth Exposed; Exposing the "Experts"

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ivL7-xFvzB0

    Discussion by scientist with proof the claim claims in "An Inconvenient Truth" of this being the warmest it has been in history.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jMqTVTPbJJI

    Scare Tactics in Al Gore's An Inconvenient Truth

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_21b7mdJz2M

    Friends of Science Global Warming Pt 1 of 10. Please watch all ten. Former scientist proponent of "GW" changes position after extended study.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JT5Ws60TAOE

     

    The Great Global Warming Swindle.

    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2332531355859226455&q=The+Great+Global+Warming+Swindle (full version 1 hr. 16 min.) Requires QuickTime.

    Additional supporting video.

    Part 1 (4:20 minutes)
    Windows Media (4.76MB) | Quicktime (9.52MB)

    Part 2 (6:21 minutes)
    Windows Media (16.3MB) | Quicktime (14.2MB)

    Part 3 (3:26 minutes)
    Windows Media (7.82MB) | Quicktime (7.59MB)

    Part 4 (5:10 minutes)
    Windows Media (12.4MB) | Quicktime (11.4MB)

    Part 5 (5:02 minutes)
    Windows Media (5.45MB) | Quicktime (11MB)

    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5949034802461518010 (1990)

    An Inconvenient Truth ... or Convenient Fiction?

    http://www.theledger.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070414/ZNYT02/704140513

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Level the Playing Field!

 

It has recently come to my attention that the Democrat liberal/progressive idea of "Leveling the Playing field." means taking away something from Conservatives. Usually giving it to another group in order to buy votes.

I think it is time to truly "Level the playing field." (Fight fire with fire.)

A few suggestions if I may.

We can start with Bank of America.
Since they propose to give illegal aliens and others credit cards, home and car loans without SSN numbers, credit checks or birth certificates it is only fair do so for everyone.


Carbon Credits.
The latest liberal excuse for their democrat leaders driving SUV's, riding in limos and flying in private jets is that the purchase "Carbon credits" that let them pollute. To level the playing field I suggest rich liberals have to show a canceled check and purchase an equal number of carbon credits to cover pollution caused by us lower classes.


Government live under SSN.
Since our Rep.'s and federal employees do not contribute to the SS system and have their own retirement system it is only fair for them to have to also pay the same S.S. taxes we of the electorate do.


Access to government subsidized abortion.
Every family that chooses to give birth to a child should have the cost of doing so free or subsidized by the abortion clinics. Each clinic should have to contribute to fund live births.

Forgiving illegal unpaid S.S. Tax, breaking the law and other benefits.
The first thing we do is let anyone serving time on their first felony be released from prison. Next, every American is given a "Felony pass card." They can commit one felony without going to jail. Next the IRS drops any claims or investigations against citizens. Then school districts have to institute "English Only" class for those Americans who do not want to speak a foreign language.


Fairness doctrine. Force all news media, newspapers, television and liberal blogs to give equal time to dissenting Conservatives. For piece that espouses a democrat liberal view they must give free time for a conservative spokesman appointed by the Conservative union to respond.


Force all news media, newspapers, television etc. to hire as many Conservatives as they do liberals. These Conservatives have to be approved by the Conservative Union.


Black organizations. Caucus, officers Assoc., every association that separates one group from another be required to become fully integrated.


Redistricting to create black voter enclaves be redrawn in the name of diversity and have an equal numbers of each race represented in the district to truly level the playing field.


Jackson, Sharpton and Farrican have to allow a white racist to speak after them. Preferably a former member of the KKK.


Before any rich person can demand out taxes they must first drop all tax breaks and gives 50% of their earnings to whatever cause they want our tax money to support. Sports stars make outrageous salaries.
Since they attended Public School they should be required to give half of their earnings to teachers who educated them raising teachers pay. Note: None of the money can go to administration.

Before any democrat can charge anyone with corruption they have to release all personal info and finances with explanation on how they got it. Nough said!!!


ACLU has to collect fees from client instead of our taxes.


Attorneys get a flat fee in Class Action Suits.

Just think. Which every party institutes these changes to level the playing field can get all of the American votes and will be in power forever.

KC




 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The "Red Neck" factor.

  In an article titled "Why America was nuked!" By Kevin McCullough published Sunday, February 4, 2007 he evasions a scenario in which the United States is rendered helpless and destroyed because several major cities are nuked. I see thinks differently.

Red Neck Factor

In every nuclear type scenario as projected in his story it seems that the same major cities are destroyed and America is ended. It's as if all things come from and flow from these cities and the elite in them. The Islamo-Fascist seem to think the same way.

I see it differently. These cities and our government are destroyed. Certain Islamic leaders all over the world call for Jihad against non-believers.

The states activate their National Guards who are soon joined by the remaining U.S. military as State Governors get together to form a intern government and hands power over to the military.

Every Red Neck from Maine to New Mexico, from Key West to Oregon grab their deer rifles or shotguns and head to the nearest military compound to volunteer.

Some form guerrilla units and seal all our borders. While others began to attack Islamic institutions in the U.S. Unfortunately all Muslims are killed or rounded up and put in camps.

All Federal rep.'s are rounded up and relieved of power over the states and the military. Most, including the President elect and his VP are charged with treason and shot at dawn the second day.

Others perceived to be at blame for the attack are murdered by guerrilla forces.

"Martial Law", if you will, is effect and in the hands of the people not the politicians.

Within hours "birds' fly as the American Military, unhandcuffed by a Congress, retaliates. The entire Middle East is destroyed.

Islam has been taught the way of peace.

Mean while Russia in hopes of escaping the coming retaliation begins to denounce the Iranians.

China who can mount a military fight but cannot with stand a nuclear war over throws Kim in N. Korea and tries to position itself to pick up the pieces. They too forget the "Red Neck" factor.

In Europe Imams call for a Jihad against non-believers. The heads of France and all European governments immediately convert to Islam along with the few elite left alive in the U.S.

The rest of the world, knowing about the "Red Neck" factor hunkers down hoping to escape the true wrath of the real American people.

"Red Necks". Sometimes called patriots.

KC

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Way of Peace!

 

As I set here writing I hear my daughter in the background practicing on the piano. Softly and melodically "Music of the night" drifts from her fingers. And, I wonder if we as a society have lost our way and have "turned and faced away from the garish light of day and listen to the music of the night."

I recently read where Hammas and other terrorist organizations are calling the latest suicide bombing in Israel a peace gesture. They say the killer is not a terrorist but a missionary of peace.

At first I was offended but then on further thought I can see their point.

Basically, if you kill enough of the enemy then the rest will seek (beg for) peace.

I do believe that the rule of "unintended consequences" has finally caught up with Islamo-fascist. It's a shame our government can't see that they have pointed the way to peace.

We need to only look back as far as the "Civil" war. Better known in the south as the "War for State rights" to illistrate how to win the peace.

Sherman's march through Georgia; his slash and burn campaign. Or the bombardment of Charleston. Lincoln fought to win. He couldn't defeat the Army of the South so he went after the spirit of the soldiers by killing their families and destroying their homes.

World War I was fought differently. The enemy was not destroyed by attacking his family and home so he came back again and caused World War II.

World War II, the war to end all war, saw saturation bombing of both military and civilian targets. Basically, Germany was turned into rubble until the people lost the will to fight and began to plot against their leaders.

Germany had learned the way of peace.

In Japan we had a different population attitude much like the attitude of the people of Islam. All power and all will come down from the leaders and the people will only surrender when their leaders are destroyed.

Nuclear bombs were dropped on Japan, not to demoralize the population but to foment dissention in the leadership. History tells us this worked.

Japan had learned the way of peace.

Unfortunately this lesson has been lost since the Korean War. In stead of destroying North Korea our government began to worry about how the rest of the world would perceive us. The UN came into being around this time.

We settled for "peace talks" that have been going on for over 50 years. In the mean time N. Korea has gone from a 3rd world starving nation to, thanks to our help, a third world starving nation with nuclear weapons. (No I don't have to name who was in charge of our government at the time. You can look it up for your selves.)

N. Korea has not learned the way of peace.

Vietnam. The same people in charge. The same results. When President Nixon ordered bombing of N. Vietnam, Congress screamed and hollered until the President halted the bombing. But it did force the North back to the peace table. We negotiated a peace that resulted in the death of over 3 million people. We are lucky they kept their ambitions local.

Vietnam has not learned the way of peace.

In Somalia the Islamo-fascist turned the country into a gangland ruled by different sects. When America attempted to provide aid to the starving population we came under attack and instead of laying waste to the gangs our President pulled out. Re-deployed if you will.

The Islamo-fascist did not learn the way of peace.


In the Gulf war we started out the right way. Hitting Baghdad and destroying their army as it ran from Kuwaiti. Then Congress and the UN howled and we signed a peace agreement.

I guess you can say we re-deployed to Saudi Arabia and surrounding countries.

Iraq did not learn the way of peace.

The terrorist moved into Afghanistan. Osama financed two attacks against our homeland and several others against our interest around the world. While other Presidents ignored these attacks President Bush responded and warned terrorist and their supporters around the world we would find them. In stead of slash and burn we chased a few Talaban out of the country.

The Talaban has not learned the way of peace.

10 years and 17 UN resolutions later Iraq still provided support and money to terrorist organizations. When confronted with complying with UN resolutions or face an invasion, Saddam chose the latter. We obliged. Congress howled and we fought a "civilized" war while the islamo-fascist fought to win.

Now Congress wants to Re Deploy.


Islam has not learned the way of peace.

Perhaps we should follow the advice of the supporters of suicide bombers.

Saturate bomb Sadar City, and Hezbola strong holds in Lebanon, maybe a nuke in the mountains of Afghanistan. Ring Teheran by bombing all the training camps on the border of Iraq. Quadafi didn't like having his palace blown up so take out one or two in Saudi Arabia and Jordan.

Maybe then Islam will learn the way of peace.

KC
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Pass it on!

The following is a copy of a blog at Judicial Watch.

I did not write the article but am quoting the entire piece just to show you the corrupt nature of the democrat party.

Senator Sleeps With Teenage Page

A South Dakota Senate Committee will decide what action to take against a popular Democratic state senator accused of sexually groping a high school page during last legislative session.

The nine-member committee has spent the last three days hearing the sordid details of what happened when Senator Dan Sutton and the teenage page shared a hotel bed at the start of the youth’s weeklong internship in the legislature. The 36-year-old senator admits he shared a bed with the page, but denies groping him in the night.

The young man, now a 19-year-old college student, says the lawmaker touched his genitals through his shorts when the two shared a bed during a two-day stay at a Holiday Inn. Friends, a cousin and a former teacher testified that the young man was visibly shaken when he told them what happened the next day. In fact, his cousin testified that she received a frantic call in which her cousin begged her to pick him up from the hotel and, when she did, “his legs were shaking and his voice was cracking.”

No criminal charges have been filed against the senator and the special panel is expected to issue a ruling on the disciplinary hearing within a week. Independent of whether Sutton sexually groped a young page under his watch, it seems highly inappropriate for the lawmaker to even share a bed with a teenager. One South Dakota political blog, which incidentally doesn’t believe the senator’s denials, writes: “Cripes, don’t sleep in the same bed as a page.

He, He, Hee

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

On Whose Authority?

 

It seems that my mind and my propensity to question authority have led me to ask for answers yet none are forthcoming.

Over the next few post I will pose a question asking by what authority either of law or of the Constitution do our legislators, both federal and local, get the authority to impose their will on "We The People"?

I invite all of my readers to post answers to these questions.

Be careful, you will be challenged to prove your answer. Do not post personal opinion, talking points or the platitudes of the left's "Joseph Gerbils." (Pun intended.) (Goebbles)

I will predict now that no Leftist/Liberal/Progressive/Democrat will attempt to answer the question because it requires thought and knowledge.

1st question.

Where did President Lincoln get the authority to deny states right to secession and suspend Habeas Corpus?

Before you answer remember Article 1 Section 8, 9, and 10.

Hint Right to Secession is guaranteed.

KC


 




Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Government out of control?

 


I begin this blog with the Articles and Amendments followed by the Constitutional powers granted to the congress and the people because there are so many people who do not know what the Constitutions says about these subjects.

They incorrectly assume that the congress will not pass any laws that do not conform to the United States Constitution.

Amendment I - Freedom of Religion, Press, Expression. Ratified 12/15/1791.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Amendment IX - Construction of Constitution. Ratified 12/15/1791.

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

Amendment X - Powers of the States and People. Ratified 12/15/1791.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

There seems to a rash of legislators on both the federal and local level passing or attempting to pass laws for which they have no legal authority to do so.

In addition to attempting to silence conservatives with the Fairness Doctrine. (See Jan. 22nd blog.)

In New York the City passes a law banning the use of trans fats in restaurants.

In Fla. the City of Boca Raton is considering the same type of legislation.

Calif. is considering a ban on parental spanking.

Senator’s Snow and Rockefeller send a letter to oil companies demanding they stop funding disagreement with global warming.

Barney Frank demands that businesses lower the pay of executives using a veiled threat.

All over the US City, country and state officials are seizing personal property in order to increase their tax base.

Congress constantly imposes an artificial "minimum wage" on businesses.

Congress ignores immigration laws bestowing citizenship on illegal aliens in order to increase their voter base.

Speaker Nanny "P." changes rules in order to allow Rep.'s of Territories to vote in committee even though the Constitution states "one man, one vote allocated to the several states."

The federal government ignores the 1st amendment by "prohibiting the free expression of religion."

The attempt to silence free expression is seeping down to the school administrators. Numerous schools have banned the wearing of any "message" shirt that might offend anyone.

Colleges have long prohibited any speech they deem improper. And have denied the right of the people peaceably to assemble.

The most egregious example of out government out of control is the attempt by congress to usurp the powers of the executive branch by establishing oversight of the office of the President. The Constitution is very clear about the checks and balances. No where does it give Congress oversight.

AS far back as President Lincoln the right of each state to govern itself without federal interference has been taken with out the consent of the people of that state.

Section 8 - Powers of Congress

The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defense and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;

To borrow money on the credit of the United States;

To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;

To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States;

To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;

To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current Coin of the United States;

To establish Post Offices and Post Roads;

To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries;

To constitute Tribunals inferior to the Supreme Court;

To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offenses against the Law of Nations;

To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;

To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;

To provide and maintain a Navy;

To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;

To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;

To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Building of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings; And

To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.


Section 9 - Limits on Congress

The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a tax or duty may be imposed on such Importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each Person.

The privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.

No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed.

(No capitation, or other direct, Tax shall be laid, unless in Proportion to the Census or Enumeration herein before directed to be taken.) (Section in parentheses clarified by Amendment XVI.)

No Tax or Duty shall be laid on Articles exported from any State.

No Preference shall be given by any Regulation of Commerce or Revenue to the Ports of one State over those of another: nor shall Vessels bound to, or from, one State, be obliged to enter, clear, or pay Duties in another.

No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law; and a regular Statement and Account of the Receipts and Expenditures of all public Money shall be published from time to time.

No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince or foreign State.

Now we have a Democrat congress wanting to establish a "department of peace." Seems to me the in George Orwells "1984" the department of peace was actually the department of War and the "media" was charged with re-writing history.


KC

Just tried to publish blog but it was refused because of a word in the Constition which means to "put up" changed it building.  PC run amuck.

KC
He, He, Hee

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Fairness Doctrine

 Over the last 12 years it has been depressing watching the Republican controlled congress. One never knew if they would act like conservatives or go liberal on us. So it is refreshing having the Democrats back in power. You never have to guess how they are going to act or what they will do.

In the first 36 of the so called 100 hour (a promise made by Newt in 94 – no new ideas for democrats. Steal conservative ones.) Democrats have managed with the help of so called republicans to give away some of your tax money calling it a ‘Increase in minimum wage." Raise gas prices by recending a tax break the Clinton administration gave to the "BIG" oil companies and "oh yea" gave away some of your tax money to fund embryo stem cell research that cannot get private funding because it shows not promise. Notice there is no tax payer money for Adult Stem Cell Research? That’s because it has shown promise and can get private money for research.

It seems that every time Democrats take control of congress they begin by taking away something from the people. Now they are reaching for your right to "Free Speech" and participation in the political debate. John McCain -R- started this process with the Election finance reform act. Now a NY Democrat has introduced a bill to reinstate the so-called "Fairness Doctrine".

What is the "Fairness Doctrine" you might ask! Basically it says that any "Radio" (notice the absence of TV) station must broadcast a decenting opinion from any of its listeners at no cost to the decenter. No cost equals no revenue so how does the stations deal with this? They stay away from controversy. Seems the liberal/progressive democrats have found a way of shutting up opponents instead of welcoming them to the debate.

I heard the sponsor of the latest bill being interviewed on the Sean Hanity radio show. Hanity asked him to address the 1st Amendment. He hemmed and hawwed mumbling something about "right to redress" After awhile it was embarrassing to hear an elective representative prove he knew nothing about the 1st Amendment. He then went on about how the airwaves were public property. (He failed to mention this public property like parks etc. cannot be used by the public without government approval.)

Let me remind you and him about the 1st Amendment.

Amendment I - Freedom of Religion, Press, Expression. Ratified 12/15/1791.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Over the years liberal/progressive Democrats have used the courts to redefine the 1st Amendment. It seems that the second part of each sentence is ignored. On religion "Or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;" It doesn’t say you can exercise your religion only in a certain place. Schools, parks, courthouses etc are public property and the 1st Amendment gives every religion the right to exercise there religious beliefs in the Public.

On speech, "Or abridging the freedom of speech." This means that we all have the right to state our opinion by what ever means available especially in the "Public" forum. In public parks of past speakers have mounted "soap boxes" and shouted their message often drowning out the other person who was trying to express their opinion.

The discovery of radio frequencies gave the people another forum for free speech. Since these waves of sound could cross state lines I understand why the Federal Government is charged with regulating the frequencies since the Constitution charges them with "regulating interstate commerce." They do this by reserving certain radio frequencies for specific uses. This keeps one station from blasting another off the air. Ever gotten mad that late at night a station in Canada or Mexico drowns out your favorite station? This happens because neither Canada nor Mexico regulates the bands and transmission power.

In stead of telling people who have a grievance against talk radio to "Change the channel" or "
Go get sponsors and start your own talk program." The Democrats want to reintroduce the "Fairness Doctrine"

Seems that the liberal/progressives put up money for liberal talk radio called "Air America." But they couldn’t keep an audience even after Democrat supporters poured millions of dollars into funding them. They didn’t succeed so, much like embryo stem cell research, the funds dried up. Why couldn’t they keep and audience? My belief is that no one wants to hear a radio commentator repeat the same things they have heard on TV and read in the newspapers. I also believe that conservative talk radio succeeds because it gives a different opinion and slant other than we read and hear from the "Mainstream Media."

KC

To my friend who receive notification of my post.

Thanks for accepting my post whether you read them or not. This makes me feel that I am doing something. I really would like your input on these blobs. I promise no flames or agitations. Or ask me questions regarding either party and I will do the research and give you the honest answer. I believe that the republican party is leaving its conservative base just as have the democrats, that it is a time for a new conservative party that represents all conservatives regardless of which party they have supported in the past.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (6) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Mindless Apes?


    



Burn Babe Burn!  Blinded by the light.

My blog friends response to my interactive chart reminds me of a passage in Jane Goodall's book where she tells of the Head Gorilla (read that as the Alpha male.) wants something from another male.  He pounds his chest and howls, demanding his right.  Soon other members of his clan pick up the howl and soon all his followers are beating their chest and howling.

They do not know what is going on, just that the leader is howling.

The Democrat leaders howl, this is picked up by the media and soon every liberal in the U.S. joins in.  Not knowning why they howl but supporting it because their leader said so.

Hee,Hee,Hee


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

FLASH-- Breaking news. This just in.  While America under attack Yahoo gives us then latest!!!




A model holds a Baby Phat handbag (Reuters)

Hazardous handbags

Big handbags can cause some serious health concerns.» More


Democrats furious and call on "Bush" to convene a council to correct problem.

Mean while, Harry Reid, claims his December call for more troops in Iraq was miss reported.  He meant to say "more troops are called for in Germany" in order to boost  E.U. economy.

When last seen Harry, Nancy and Teddy were ducking (into a bar)   D. Durbin and the big Murth while wearing Algore for president tee shirts.  John Kerry stated that he was a Vietnam hero and Mary Jo copechne was unavailable for comment.  Joe Bidden, when ask for a comment, said "What Me Worry?" Senator Clinton was unavailable while having her nails done.  Former Vice President AlGore stated

"He Betrayed this country. My Daddy said I would be President and the Daily clan couldn't steal the election.  You are all going to die from global freezing ---what? --- I meant warming.." 

Yea thats the ticket ---  global warming.



More as this story develops.
 


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Rich People

Factoid


Movie stars and vocal artist appear in front of Congress and on stage to espouse causes they believe in at no benefit to themselves.

Are you sure?

Several artist put on a program to prevent aids.  "Bono sings".

His accountant deducts his normal fees for singing from his tax forms.  It is a loss of income.

Then "Bono" appears before Congress challenging them to spend tax payer money on "His Cause". 

(Why doesn't he demand this from his country of birth?)

Basically, he has earned millions of dollars with his name and voice, deducted his appearance from his tax forms and demanded that Congress take your money to support his favorite cause.


Is this a great country or what?

Ole Oxinfre, Esq.
 

 



 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Lessons of the past?

I believe that the foundation for our present "Quagmire" in Iraq was laid as far back as 1975 in Vietnam when a Democrat controlled Congress refused to honor our commitment to fund the South Vietnam government.  Then  a series of political steps magnified this mistake to the point that we have suffered attacks on American soil.  A thing we thought impossible until Sept. 11, 2001. 

But a careful review of history will show that this 9/11 attack was inevitable and brought on by a failure of the news media to report the facts and politicians by ignoring the warning signs.

Unlike some "Talk show" host I do not believe there is a conspiracy.  I believe we are living in an age of
                                "If I thought or said it it must be true!"

That we are living in the age of George Orwells "1984".  History is what the media and government say it is.  That reasoning and questioning is dead.  The reporters of the news media are not conspirators but persons without the ability to question and think.
 
I believe these events were set into motion starting with Congress abandoning the South Vietnamese government,  President Carters handling  of the Iranian attack on the US embassy,  and President Clintons handling of the bombing of the Trade Center Towers in Feb. 1993 by the "Blind Sheik" funded by al-Qaeda.  Closely followed by the Clinton defeat in "The Battle of Mogadishu" in Oct. of 1993.
 
What I find frightening is research shows that with few notable exceptions; the same Democrat members of Congress who abandoned the South Vietnamese government are in office today and calling for "redeployment" from Iraq.  If they get this will they "de-Fund" the support for the present Iraqi government?

Over the next few weeks I will attempt to lay out the evidence and support for my beliefs. I invite my readers to comment on my facts or offer any proof that I am wrong or my logic is flawed.

President Kennedy committed US troops to South Vietnam as advisors.  I was one of those "Advisors".  When he was murdered, President L.B. Johnson expanded the Vietnam war - For Profit.

See Robert S. McNamara book (In retrospect: the tragedy and lessons of Vietnam.(1995) 
Argument without end: in search of answers to the Vietnam tragedy.
(Robert S. McNamara,(1999) )

Proof?  Look up a company called "Halliburton  aka Kellog,Brown and Root".

Halliburton
As soon as LBJ became president, he escalated the war in Vietnam, which primarily benefited Brown and Root  later purchased by Halliburton.

Nearly 40 years ago, Halliburton faced almost identical charges over its work for the U.S. government in Vietnam -- allegations of overcharging, sweetheart contracts from the White House and war profiteering. Back then, the company's close ties to President Johnson became a liability.

Cite NPR (National Public Radio)  They continue - -

After Johnson took over the Oval Office, Brown & Root won contracts for huge construction projects for the federal government. By the mid-1960s, newspaper columnists and the Republican minority in Congress began to suggest that the company's good luck was tied to its sizable contributions to Johnson's political campaign.

More questions were raised when a consortium of which Brown & Root was a part won a $380 million contract to build airports, bases, hospitals and other facilities for the U.S. Navy in South Vietnam. By 1967, the General Accounting Office had faulted the "Vietnam builders" -- as they were known -- for massive accounting lapses and allowing thefts of materials.


It seems that Democrats lodge the same charges against President Bush and Vice President Chaney. (Because he was the head of Halliburton at one time.)  Why don't you take a look at stock holders in Halliburton?

Got your interest?  I hope so.  




                        NEWT IN 08. "A real Regan Conservative."

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Why I'm Conservative?

The format on this post is a little different because I want to address a question that was asked of me.  I received the following in an email from my Daughter.

">I am enjoying your blog, dad. <
>How did a vietnam vet that grew up in the rural south become so conservative?<
>From my view you have all the markings to be a liberal democrat. <"

I suppose this is a contradiction but my life seems to be one contradiction after the other.  And the apple doesn't fall far from the tree.  Let me tell you about "My Little Girl" before I answer her question.


She is an accomplished artist, not sure of her political beliefs but I am sure it is filled with skepticism and compassion.  She is married to a Professor of History who is working on his Doctorate and devoutly religious.   At 16 she had paintings hanging in the halls of Congress, at 18 she received a scholarship to the Atlanta collage of art.  At 19 the collage said they could not teach her anything because she was superior to their program and offered to pay half the cost to send her to Paris to study. 

Impressive? Now to the contradictions. She did not want to go to Paris because she had discovered "5 Corners" in Atlanta and she did not want to be told how to paint.  She wanted to just let it happen.  She was a "Grung/Punk" mosh pit rocker with dyed hair.  But, she is also a vegetarian, weight lifter runner health nut.  Lets not forget that she is a devout christian.  See any contradictions there?

As to her question - 

Our family had been land owners in N.C. since before the Revolutinary way. I can remember my Grandparents driving us around the county showing us all the land our family used to own.  They took great pride in showing me where a ancestor had died defending this country.  They were proud of our family of "Citizen Soldiers"  and maintained the battlefield markers through out the county bearing the names of ancestors who had died during the Revolutinary war and the War of Session.

Thats when  I learned why we were "Share Croppers" who worked someone else land.  It seems that In the United States, the federal government levied inheritance taxes.   As the head of each family died the land was left to children, brothers and sisters with just one catch.  They had to sell some of the land to pay the inheritance taxes.  Over a couple hundred years it seems there was nothing left except the main house and a few acres.

I was born a Democrat as were all my ancestors.   There were no Conservatives or Liberals/Progressives.  You were a Democrat or a Republican and everyone knew that Republicans were the rich industrialist yankees.  Democrats would protect us poor farmers and keep the rich Republicans from taking our farms and life style.

Even at a young age I began to notice that every time the "Govermentman" came around he was taking something from us and he was a Democrat.  There was a term we used back then "plow it under".  The Democrat farm co op guy would show up with a check and say. "I'll give you this check but you have to plow under several rows of your crops.  Tobacco, peanuts or cotton didn't make any difference.  It was like the Mafia "I'm gonna do you dis favor but you gotta do this thing for me."

I also noticed that when we had a bad year the "Governmentman" just couldn't take a chance and loan us any money but the rich Republican Banker always seemed to be able to help.  Tradition is tradition and we voted Democrat.  Then one year, after a hurricane, things got so bad that my Dad gave up and moved us to the city.

In 1960 I heard the call of President Kennedy (D) and enlisted in the US Army to fight the "Red Minis" that was threatening to take over the world.  When President Johnson (D) vowed to stop the spread of communism in S.E. Asia I volunteered for Vietnam.  While I was over there we saw news of people in the US demonstrating against the war and heard the debate in congress about getting us out of Vietnam.  But something didn't seem right.  The under tone was that some how we, the soldiers, were responsible for what was happening.  When I was discharged I faced the same charges.  I knew I didn't start the war, the Democrats did, but I was somehow responsible for it because I had answered the call to defend this country.

A family by the name of Kellum ran the local party and I became very supportive of them.  I put up signs, walked neighborhoods and supported whom ever the Democrat party choose to run.  I also became friends with the head of the local Republican party and was eventually asked to change my party affiliation, move into the county and run for city council as a republican.  I refused but word got out and I became "persona non grata"  in the democrat party.  Even my Masonic brothers turned their backs on me.  I became non political.

Over the next few years I watched from the side lines as Jimmy Carter made a fool of our country.  One day I heard an actor, named Ronald Reagan, speaking about our country.  This was the kind of man we needed to lead our country.  I was becoming  a Conservative Republican and I threw myself back into politics.  Then when I read a book by President Johnsons Secty. of Defence my admitting that the democrats never intended to win the war in Vietnam my transformation was complete. 

It seems that I did not leave the Democrat party.  I was always a conservative.  They left me for something called liberalism.  Compare the Democrat party of today with the party of President Kennedy and you can see how much they have changed. 


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous12Next »